3. (A) The Indian Constitution can be compared to the constitutive rules of a game like football because both define the fundamental principles and structure of their respective systems.
(R) Just as breaking the rules of football changes the nature of the game, amending the Indian Constitution can alter the fundamental nature of the country.
Key Concept: Constitutive Rules, Indian Constitution
a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion compares the Indian Constitution to the constitutive rules of a game like football, emphasizing that both define the fundamental principles and structure of their respective systems. This is accurate because the Constitution lays down the basic framework for governance, rights, and duties in India, just as the rules of football define how the game is played. The reason states that just as breaking the rules of football changes the nature of the game, amending the Indian Constitution can alter the fundamental nature of the country. This is also true, as significant amendments to the Constitution can lead to changes in the political, social, or legal fabric of the nation. Moreover, the reason correctly explains the assertion by highlighting the parallel between the two systems in terms of the impact of altering foundational rules. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
Your Answer is correct.
a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion compares the Indian Constitution to the constitutive rules of a game like football, emphasizing that both define the fundamental principles and structure of their respective systems. This is accurate because the Constitution lays down the basic framework for governance, rights, and duties in India, just as the rules of football define how the game is played. The reason states that just as breaking the rules of football changes the nature of the game, amending the Indian Constitution can alter the fundamental nature of the country. This is also true, as significant amendments to the Constitution can lead to changes in the political, social, or legal fabric of the nation. Moreover, the reason correctly explains the assertion by highlighting the parallel between the two systems in terms of the impact of altering foundational rules. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.