43. (A) The displacement of Adivasis from their traditional forest lands has led to a significant decline in their extensive knowledge of medicinal plants.
(R) Adivasis have historically used around 10,000 plant species, with 8,000 being used for medicinal purposes.
Key Concept: Adivasis and Marginalisation, Traditional livelihoods linked to forests and agriculture
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that the displacement of Adivasis has led to a decline in their knowledge of medicinal plants. This is true because, as per the syllabus, Adivasis have been displaced from their traditional forest lands due to economic changes, forest policies, and industrial projects. Displacement disrupts their access to and use of forest resources, including medicinal plants.
The reason states that Adivasis have historically used around 10,000 plant species, with 8,000 being used for medicinal purposes. This is also true according to the syllabus. However, the reason does not directly explain why their knowledge has declined; it only provides background information on their usage of medicinal plants.
Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
Your Answer is correct.
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that the displacement of Adivasis has led to a decline in their knowledge of medicinal plants. This is true because, as per the syllabus, Adivasis have been displaced from their traditional forest lands due to economic changes, forest policies, and industrial projects. Displacement disrupts their access to and use of forest resources, including medicinal plants.
The reason states that Adivasis have historically used around 10,000 plant species, with 8,000 being used for medicinal purposes. This is also true according to the syllabus. However, the reason does not directly explain why their knowledge has declined; it only provides background information on their usage of medicinal plants.
Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.